Random Reflections
Saturday, 7 June 2025
The State of our Landscape: Insights from the last thirty days
Tuesday, 13 May 2025
Opinion Deluge and how it's shaping us
Many of us remember the national English dailies of the past decades and their celebrated editors. Our fathers insisted that we read them daily, seeing it as a prescription for both knowledge of current affairs and intellectual development. These editors wrote opinion pieces that shaped national discourse on issues of great importance. They were highly educated, groomed by the experts of their time, and had extensive real-world experience. Known for their integrity and honesty, they commanded the respect of both their readers and the broader public.
These editors were the chieftains who
controlled the flow of information through their news outlets. They represented
specific political and economic ideologies and built large followings around
them. Their credibility was undeniable because they were not directly involved
in politics or motivated by commercial interests. The reputation of a newspaper
was closely tied to the credibility of its editors.
They had advantages that other did not have.
They were well-connected to global sources of information on political and
economic trends. They regularly socialized with influential people and had
access to real-time news and developments through exclusive
channels—information that the public often received only a day later through
them.
In this sense, they were the major influencers
of public opinion.
Because of the trust they had built, their
opinions were highly influential in shaping how the public formed its own
views. They were seen as the conscience keepers of the nation. The governments
of their time could not ignore their opinions and often sought their support
during critical moments. As the gatekeepers of knowledge for the public, these
editors understood the weight of their responsibility and the importance of
maintaining their reputation.
However, this equation began to change in the
1990s with the rise of private news channels that broadcasted 24/7. Newspapers,
once the dominant source of news, began to transform into trade papers, often
packed with advertisements rather than hard-hitting journalism. Electronic
media, and social media in particular, have contributed to this shift. The
advent of influencers with millions of followers has replaced the editorial
authority once held by traditional editors. In the process, much of what made journalism
credible has been eroded.
Social media, the most disruptive force in
modern information-sharing, has altered the media landscape. It has connected
anyone with a phone and an internet connection to a global audience, bypassing
traditional news filters. Now, anyone can voice their opinion with a post or a
comment, bypassing the old system of submitting a letter to the editor and
waiting for publication.
While social media has had positive
effects—such as ensuring global connectivity, facilitating information sharing,
and providing a platform for self-expression—it has also had negative
consequences. The addictive nature of social media, combined with its ability
to distract and reduce productivity, has reached epidemic proportions. This
global issue, which affects people across all social, economic, and age groups,
doesn't yet have an immediate solution.
One recent tragedy that underscores these
dangers was the case of a young girl who took her life because she couldn't
reach her self-imposed target of one million followers. Social media
monetization programs have prompted individuals, particularly women, to create
and share content that caters to the baser instincts of the public. This has
led to the creation of shallow, often vulgar content designed solely to gain
followers and, by extension, money. The degradation of standards is a growing
concern, one that is rarely discussed.
When society defines success solely in terms
of money, it inevitably loses the moral courage to question the means by which
that success is achieved.
But these are the choices we make as
individuals. What is more troubling, however, is our vulnerability to
manipulation. Social media platforms have the power to influence our thoughts
and decisions, often numbing our common sense and blocking our imaginations by
creating false perceptions of reality. The ability to spread misleading or
false information, paired with tools that can make such information go viral,
is a significant threat. The lack of editorial oversight on these platforms
allows misinformation to spread unchecked. The recent advancements in AI and
digital rendering have only compounded the issue, enabling even more
sophisticated forms of disinformation.
The recent war serves as an example of how
this issue plays out in real time. Some reputable news outlets created war-room
scenarios in their studios, using AI-generated images and videos to depict
heroics on the battlefield. These dramatizations were so convincing that many
influential individuals took them as truth, sharing them widely. The outlets
later deleted these posts, but by then, the damage had been done. People still
believe these fabricated stories to be true.
The motives behind this are multifaceted. News
outlets compete for higher TRPs, governments seek a psychological advantage
over their enemies, and politicians use these narratives to bolster their own
image. The result has been the creation of carefully crafted opinions that
reflect tactical agendas. Even when evidence is presented to challenge these
narratives, those who question them are often met with hostility and abuse.
This is not a new phenomenon. Strategic
efforts to shape mass opinion have been underway for some time, using tactics
like fake IDs, troll armies, and content manipulation to influence public
perceptions. Opposing views are often silenced by relentless online harassment.
The rise of "neutral" users who join in the trolling frenzy further
amplifies the chaos, with many convinced they are performing a patriotic duty.
This, in many ways, is the worst thing that
could happen to a civil society. Those who perpetrate these disinformation
campaigns, especially during times of national crisis, do so without any shame
or remorse. Yet, in an age of information overload, who holds them accountable?
Open access to information and the
democratization of voices on social media has resulted in what some are calling
an "opinion deluge." Exposure to an overwhelming amount of
content—both verified and false—has significant effects on mental health,
leading to stress, anxiety, and even depression. People often express their
agreement by liking or sharing content, while disagreement can result in
negative comments or even personal attacks.
The situation in Pahalgam illustrates how
quickly anger and grief can be misdirected. Following the tragic event, many
people directed their outrage toward our neighbouring country and an entire
community, fuelled by inflammatory content shared on social media. Those who
called for restraint, such as Himanshi Narwal, were met with vitriol and
harassment. Similarly, Vikram Misri, who announced the understanding of ceasefire
between two countries, faced severe trolling, including threats to his family.
Who were the perpetrators of this online
abuse? Ordinary people like us—some acting out of malice, others simply
reacting to content they disagreed with without considering the bigger picture.
This brings us to a crucial question: How are our thoughts and behaviors being shaped by the opinions we encounter on social media? The transformation this has caused in society is something we must seriously reflect on.
*
Saturday, 10 May 2025
Couch Patriots, are we a victim of framing effect
Wednesday, 12 February 2025
What's in a Kiss, Man.
Friday, 22 November 2024
Tighten Your Seatbelts and Meet Prakash Sethi
Cuttack Sadar MLA Prakash Sethi's English speech at Baliyatra inauguration has gone Viral......the caption shrieked from the rooftop.
Baliyatras have been
happening for decades, and the one of 2024 got the biggest eyeball for an interesting incident. Prakash Sethi, Cuttack Sadar MLA from the ruling party, gave
a speech in English on the inauguration day. This year, ambassadors, high commissioners, and diplomats from 14 ASEAN, BIMSTEC, and Pacific countries attended the fair for the first time.
Who is Prakash Sethi?
Many not only heard his name for the first time but also heard him speak for the first time. He spoke in English for the benefit of the dignitaries who had come from the neighbouring countries. The video clip perhaps got forwarded a million times over WhatsApp.
And the story continues…
another video of his interaction with the press made rounds as a follow-up to
the first one.
On being confronted by the
press about his speech in ‘Horrible English’; he brushed aside the allegation by saying that
the speech was for the visiting dignitaries who speak and understand this type
of English and this time the Odia Asmita had to be conveyed and that has been done perfectly.
Two totally different things
happened in two distinctly different groups.
The ones who knew the
language were shell-shocked, many cringed with disbelief and the ones who did
not know the language, mostly his political constituents thought that he gave a thundering
speech from an important platform.
To people like Sethi, the former group doesn’t matter as most of them don’t vote and his ultimate mission of positioning himself as an important leader before the eye of his followers was achieved.
Charcha mein rehna hai; he has understood the ground rule to be in the news even if for the wrong reasons to stay relevant in the political space. And for that, he was prepared to take any amount of hit from the people who don’t matter. He knew what he wanted at the end and his body language exuded nonchalant confidence after achieving that.
A few innate characteristics differentiate them from people like us.
They are the people who have
nothing to lose, they are ambitious, confident, agile, and gritty and they are not
ashamed of not being sophisticated. They are the Laloo Yadavs who are here to
rattle the status quo.
Remember the early migrants
to the US? The people of that generation changed their names, religion, attire,
accents, and manners to be accepted in their adoptive country. They couldn’t become
one of them but made a laughingstock of themselves in the process as their poor
caricatures.
The Brownsahibs and Chutney
Merries of the colonial era were their predecessors.
But the IT mass migration after the 1990s changed all that. Millions migrated to the US to fill the skill void there and made that country their home. Most of them migrated not from the metros but from its hinterlands—from thousands of villages and small towns, with only four years of exposure outside those places during the engineering course at some nondescript college.
Armed with just IT skills and the grit to strike root at any cost, their lack of Western manners or cultural expertise never came in their way of adopting the new country with its alien culture. Our people didn't change themselves to their socio-cultural standards but continued with their style as most of them lived in close communities like ghetto. The majority of their wives in the US speak English which is no different from Sethi’s but have emphatically stamped our cultural signs there. They are our cultural ambassadors who walk the streets in sarees during RathYatra and have made ghagra choli, Bhangra beats, Garba and Bollywood dance our best-exported cultural goods.
Comparing them with the earlier
migrants, who were neither accepted there nor welcomed back here, these brash, uncouth guys do more to export our culture and assert our own identities in seemingly hostile foreign countries. If we see Ratha Yatra and Boita Bandana being celebrated all over the world, it is led by these gritty, unsophisticated brethren of ours. The sophisticated lot didn’t win the battle
because they were too worried about how they would look on horseback or if
anyone would ridicule them for what they were.
We must take note of this
fact.
Let us not forget how the monopolization of the political space by one party, which was led by a few people for close to a quarter century, did not give any leader the space to hone their skills and grow. The systematic destruction of college-level politics, which is known as the nursery of future leaders, emasculated the state of any leader of stature for the next
few decades.
We are witnessing a transition and transformation, and we must prepare ourselves to deal with these types of leaders in the coming years. We may laugh, and ridicule them in private or troll them on social media at best, but please be in the know that they are immune to your barbs and chuckles and are here to stay.
Thursday, 3 October 2024
From Love to Love
Love,
I understand your feelings and the depth of your love for me and I'm in acute pain now while writing this letter to you.
We both are adults enough to understand that we are in a mutually consensual relationship with no social sanction. It's immoral and in many ways illegal. It breaks my heart to tell the obvious. Hence, it will always exist and thrive between us only in our secret privacy with only the phones as its mute witnesses. The space and time available to us is the net after it's taken by our physical, social, and professional sides. We can't change or contest it, we can't encroach on this, and we must respect these Laxman Rekha. After all, we are respectable people.
Overruling the urges of the heart to sustain it is the saddest burden of an adulterous affair.
We must learn to accept it and not disturb the time and space made available to us. Don't you think I crave these moments when you are busy with your family, friends, and professional commitments? Yes. But I am wise, keep it bottled, and never let it overwhelm my logical and practical side.
We will have only a few rare ephemeral moments available to us that allow us to live our secret desires, intertwine and make love till the point of death, meld with each other's bodies and souls and emulsify. We will participate in an alchemy of souls but can not give birth to anything that ever will be termed ours.
You are mine and special. You exist both in my physical and mental world. And it will be so till my death.
When that moment comes, let's dance naked with our eyes closed, our wrinkled bodies plastered against each other's, shorn inhibitions and shame for those fleeting duration in that temporary space, under the bright light of darkness where no one exists other than us.
Don't murder the fruiting of those moments by becoming restless and demanding more, and by raising your expectations and comparing yourself with others.
Unfortunately yours,
Love
Saturday, 28 September 2024
Why Gandhi Must be Resurrected
"Earth provides enough to satisfy every man's needs, but not every man's greed."
It’s a part of the full quote from the
letter Gandhi wrote to RM Pearce, in December 1947. The full quote is "God
forbid that India should ever take to industrialism after the manner of the
West... The earth has enough for everybody's need, but not enough for
everybody's greed." Gandhi expressed the idea barely a few months after
independence when the country was taking its first few baby steps to stand and
walk properly. This quote has since become a popular phrase, highlighting the
tension between Basic human needs (food, water, shelter, dignity), and
Insatiable desires driven by greed (excess wealth, power, material
possessions). He had already seen the ills of frenzied industrialization and
was conceiving the country of his dreams.
He was a visionary and like a true
leader was thinking ahead of time.
He was just not clear about the need
to avoid the mistakes of the West, but he gave the various ways to avoid it.
Gandhi emphasized the importance of simplicity, sustainability, and equitable
distribution of resources. He advocated for a self-sufficient economy and
criticized excessive consumption. Gandhi's wisdom remains relevant today,
inspiring conversations around sustainable development, environmental
conservation, social justice, and mindful consumption.
The world is now grappling with the
tension between economic development and sustainable development. The effects
of climate change are real, and, on many counts, its negative effects are
irreversible. We have made giant strides since independence. So big are our
strides and such restless is our pace that it shows no sign of slowing down to
pause and ponder its effect on us.
To quote the Science Advances,
“Planetary boundaries framework update finds that six of the nine boundaries
are transgressed, suggesting that Earth is now well outside of the safe
operating space for humanity. Ocean acidification is close to being breached, while aerosol loading regionally exceeds the boundary. Stratospheric ozone levels have slightly recovered. The
transgression level has increased for all boundaries earlier identified as
overstepped. As primary production drives Earth system biosphere functions,
human appropriation of net primary production is proposed as a control variable
for functional biosphere integrity. This boundary is also transgressed. Earth
system modelling of different levels of the transgression of the climate and
land system change boundaries illustrates that these anthropogenic impacts on
Earth system must be considered in a systemic context.”
October 2nd marks the 155th
anniversary of Gandhiji.
What we have left of him is his name,
a few busts in a few city crossings and memorials in select locations - the
current generation is completely detached from him, his life and his teachings.
The only time he is resurrected is when a certain section of a certain
political thought vilifies him for his personal and political decisions. Movies
like Munnabhai MBBS have done more to bring back his values and principles than
our successive political satraps and administrations.
On his birth month, this article is an
attempt to reintroduce his principles and prescriptions to the current
generation and evaluate its relevance, especially at a time when we are facing
an existential crisis caused by anthropogenic activities. Let’s know what they
were and if we can do anything in our personal capacities to live by those
principles.
A. Simplicity and Minimalism:
Gandhi emphasised living simply with
bare necessities. His personal belongings could be fitted into a small bag. A
few loin clothes, a shawl, a chappal, his watch stuck to his waist, the
round-rimmed glass he wore, and a walking stick he used was all that he needed.
When Mahatma Gandhi met King George V in 1931, wearing his traditional Indian
clothing, a simple loincloth and shawl, journalists asked him if he felt
underdressed. Gandhi famously replied: "The King had enough on for both of
us."
This witty response highlighted
Gandhi's simplicity, humility, and commitment to Indian cultural identity,
while also subtly critiquing the excesses of Western colonialism.
Sadly, we also have fallen victim to
those consumption models and patterns. Our rooms are now filled with more
cupboards stuffed with clothes and belongings that we didn’t use in the recent
past or are never going to be used in the near future leaving no space for us
to use. ‘Do we need to have this’ is a question we must ask ourselves before
falling for the temptation of a new dress, a gadget, a car or anything for that
matter. The subculture of giving away things we have stopped using has caught
on in the West and things like kids’ toys, and cycles are handed down to the
ones who need them once one’s child outgrows them. There are apps and WhatsApp
groups which aggregate the needs and availability of such things. The idea is
to reduce purchases and waste without compromising on lifestyle conveniences.
B. Self-Sufficiency and Localism:
When Gandhi started his Swadeshi
movement, hatred for foreign goods or foreigners didn’t propel this idea. He
wanted all of us to be self-reliant at a personal and community level. Doing
your things, growing your food, and helping each other during difficult tasks
was what he proposed to make us live with dignity without depending on others
at a distance who have turned it into an industry. He was for supporting local
farmers and businesses to thrive with local support. When we see grapes
imported from countries like Australia and the ones from Andhra or Maharastra
sharing shop space giving us an option to choose from; how many of us think of
the ‘Food Miles’ each lot carries? We are swayed by its cosmetic appearance and
premium pricing. The current trend is to source local produce even if there are
cheaper and better options available with the eye to reducing our carbon
footprint.
C. Non-Violence:
The reductionist and mechanistic
science and modern-day science taught us to dominate nature and all other
living and non-living things around us. Our ancient culture taught us to
respect natural elements and animals to the point of worshipping them like
Gods. Now in the name of development, we have unleashed a war on mountains,
rivers, lakes and seas. The ill effects are now realised in the form of massive
landslides, floods in the hills sweeping away human habitations, and our urban
habitations experiencing flooding even in moderate rains. When Gandhi talked of
Ahimsa, he didn’t mean to be tolerant to external aggression, or internal
violence. What he talked of was environmental stewardship and our ethical
treatment of all living beings.
D. Ethical Consumption:
The first line in this article talks
about Gandhi's views on the importance of ethical consumption as the resources
on the planet are finite and need to be shared equitably with all. He urged
everyone to balance Need and Greed because the greed of a rich man to get
richer will only rob the poor and weak of their right over the common natural
resources.
E. Community and Collective Action:
With the masculine development models
and centralised decision-making being the current characteristic of the
Governments, the voices of the local communities are either quelled or bought
over. The current society treats demonstrations, and strikes, not only as
anti-development but as regressive and anti-national. Gandhi put a higher
emphasis on community-level collective actions as a way to influence the
government’s policy decisions. Democracy allowed this route for the communities
to express their voices. The current climate crisis requires honesty and
transparency at the top and collective action and participation of all to
ameliorate the ills caused by our development models. Without both ends working
together towards a common goal the desirables will always remain unattainable.
The current strategic political
movement to rewrite history to erase its colonial past, and replace its
syncretic cultures, and diversities with a singular-centric culture stands at
odds with what our ancient culture taught us and had made it thrive. Gandhi and
his teachings have fallen victim to this house-cleaning exercise. With the
economy going global many might question the rationale or practicality of many
of Gandhi’s prescriptions, but it's necessary to realise how the global
business models came crashing down when the pandemic spread like wildfire and
brought the countries to a grinding halt. At that time self-sufficiency at the
community level provided the necessary spring of resilience to rural India.
Those who think that Climate concerns
are an exaggeration and those who believe that modern science will find a
solution to the problem without their involvement and contribution are for a
rude shock. Recent research by the Indian Institute of Tropical Meteorology
after conducting research at the caves of Gupteswar, Koraput and Kadapa, Andhra
Pradesh have revealed the interplay of climate factors, strikingly similar to
those affecting modern-day monsoons, likely led to the collapse of highly
developed Indus Valley Civilization 4000 years ago. They have found that
reduced solar radiation, El Nino and many other factors had collectively
weakened the monsoon which resulted in the downfall of the civilization. And
4000 years is just like yesterday in the evolutionary timeline.
I hope the learnings of the past and
evidence of science alert our governors not to waste precious time in hand to
repaint the past but to think of the future which doesn’t look good at all for
everyone. With the world at the throes of facing another pandemic and the
catastrophic consequences of anthropogenic activities; not bringing back the
teachings of Gandhi to us and the younger generation will be to the peril of us
and our future generations.
*
The State of our Landscape: Insights from the last thirty days
On May 22nd, we marked one month since the Pahalgam terrorist attack, and today marks thirty days since ‘Operation Sindoor’, which India lau...
-
In 1972, my father brought home gifts for my sister and me from his trip. Two books, the Ramayana and the Mahabharata, were written by Chakr...
-
A New Year party, an hour past midnight, euphoria dying down, a couple mildly drunk were seen dancing alone to the slowing tempo of the musi...
-
Cuttack Sadar MLA Prakash Sethi's English speech at Baliyatra inauguration has gone Viral......the caption shrieked from the rooftop. ...