THE AIRPORT WAS UNEXPECTEDLY CROWDED FOR A WEEKEND EARLY morning; the chill and constant drizzle since the last 4/5 days had done little to reduce the rush. Waiting for my turn at the security check, I was looking at the people and their movements ahead of me. Some were breezing past, and some were goofing up causing the snarl.
People traveling to the Goas and Gorakhpurs were all in one queue.
Ahead of me
was this girl in her early 30s who stood out because of the way she was dressed
in that damp chilly winter Bengaluru morning. Her slinky dress hung well past
her knees, but the designer had chosen to lop off the back by three quarters to
make some fashion statement.
The hushed
exchange of words coming from a family standing behind though was not very
audible, but one could guess that it’s the girl and the dress was the cause of
mirth. I had joined the discussion mentally without realizing it.
My idle mind
was processing questions relating to her age, her educational background, her
social status, what made her wear that dress when people all around were
desperate to cover themselves up. I was trying to slot it to a rational
framework to fit her not so justifiable sartorial choice.
So many questions and thoughts. It broke when I realized that I was standing right at the belt to drop my hand baggage for screening. A few minutes later I could feel that I had overcome with the emotion of guilt as if I had violated that poor girl and her boundaries. Why was I feeling guilty? Are we as human beings naturally not expected to analyze things constantly as they happen around us?
After settling near the departure gate, I started
reflecting.
In this scene in Dostana, Seetal Sahni, a role played by Zeenat Aman hauls up a roadside Romeo to the police station for whistling at her and singing a suggestive song. Vijay, the Inspector in charge played by Amitabh Bacchan locks the delinquent and like any good man of those times, counseled the affected party to change her ways for her safety and public decency. His long dialogue penned by Salim-Javed included sentences like ‘Log ish kapde mein dekhke seeti nahin to kya mandir mein ghanti bajayange? Zeenat was seen mostly covered up in the rest of the movie which means the girl was disciplined.
That was 1980.
Dostana:
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=530OND2MQig).
Cut to 2016; in the movie Pink; the same Amitabh this time playing a lawyer seals his closing statement with his epoch-making thunderous ‘A NO means NO’ dialogue sending a message to the patriarchy, misogyny, and all the moral police in the society that whatever may be the background of the girl, her dress, the situation and the act she was found doing when she says NO her wishes SHALL have to be respected.
Pink:
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZRJE7oufEzU)
While the audience of Dostana agreed with what Amitabh said THEN and the audience of Pink also agreed with what Amitabh said NOW. In these two scenes society felt that this is what men should do. Then it was expected good men to advise, now they are advised not to advise. If a remake of Dostana is planned now will Salim-Javed write a similar dialogue and Amitabh agree to deliver it? No! These two dialogues of Amitabh as Inspector Vijay to Lawyer Deepak Saigal perhaps best describe the evolution of the role of the male in our society in these three decades.
In 2008 when
a lady journalist Soumya Viswanathan was mysteriously found dead in Delhi while
returning from her late-night beat. Hell broke loose when the then CM, Sheela
Dixit suggested that the lady journalists avoid venturing out in the night. The
reaction to her statement was noisier than what the death of the journalist had
created. She was called out for her insensitive patriarchal condescending
statement despite being a woman. She was asked to SHUT UP and instead do her
job of making the streets of Delhi safer. Perhaps our parents in this situation
would still say what she said, she chose not to react. Biju Pattnaik in her position
perhaps would have said like what Amitabh said in Dostana in the 80s in his
inimitable ways but imagine the size of the backlash he would have faced.
I after
thinking deeply about these changes realized how brick by brick the role of men
in our society has been changed. His role as a physically superior, Protector,
Provider, Guardian, Custodian of the family, and responsible towards the society
has not only been questioned but challenged. So much so that they are now
conditioned into feeling guilty if they engage in any one of the above acts.
They have
been asked and taught not to judge, not to give an opinion, and to shut up,
keep off, stay off, look the other way, walk away from most of their so-called
masculine roles. The poor man as a father can’t give his opinion on his children
fearing patriarchy, on his wife fearing the label of being chauvinistic, on other women,
misogyny, to his friends fearing the label sexist.
Society
evolves at a glacial pace with one generation drawing inspiration from its
preceding generation and mostly leaving theirs as a leitmotif for the next. On International
Men’s Day, my thought goes out to the men of my generation, whose role has been
changed so much and so fast that if whatever he does will ever qualify as a positive
example in the future? Men look like the new dartboard.